Research US venture capital and angel investors by matching your actual location, funding stage and sector evidence. A Texas enterprise startup, a Midwest healthcare company and a New York software team may need different investor routes.
This selected guide compares 23 venture and angel routes across several US regions. It separates direct venture capital, public or regional programs, and member-led angel networks; it is not a ranking or a complete register.
Choose the financing route and company evidence
- Describe the next milestone. Separate a product prototype, early customers and a growth round.
- Check geographic criteria. A Texas-founder requirement differs from a national fund with a Texas office.
- Match the sector. Healthcare, enterprise software, climate and generalist funds have distinct theses.
- Identify the investor route. A fund, angel network, accelerator and loan program do not make the same decision.
Compare 23 US investor routes
Use provider type, stage and geographic connection together. An office address is not a promise of eligibility. Where the current source does not establish a precise entry stage, the table leaves that question open.
Selected US venture investors and explicitly labeled angel networks, researched October 29, 2026. Local offices and investor networks have distinct criteria. On small screens, scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Investor or network | Provider type | Stage | Sector focus | Geographic connection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequoia Capital | Venture investment platform | Confirm the relevant current fund and entry stage | Technology; strategy-specific | US investment platform with international company-building activity |
| Andreessen Horowitz | Multi-strategy venture platform | Fund-specific; confirm current entry stage | AI; enterprise; fintech; bio and health; other strategies | US venture platform with several specialized funds |
| Greylock | Venture investment platform | Early company-building; confirm the current fund | Technology; company-specific | US venture platform; verify company and team connection |
| Mucker Capital | Early-stage venture firm and accelerator | Seed and Series A; accelerator route differs | Technology; company-specific | Focus on startups outside Silicon Valley; US and other routes vary |
| Madrona | Venture capital firm | Seed, early and acceleration stages | AI; enterprise; data; security; deep technology | Seattle and Bay Area presence, with wider activity |
| Union Square Ventures | Generalist venture firm | Earliest company-building stages; confirm current vehicle | AI; robotics; energy; consumer; money; biotech | New York-based with investments in multiple markets |
| Primary Venture Partners | Seed-stage venture firm | Seed | Sector-specific technology strategies | New York venture platform; verify the current company-market connection |
| First Round | Seed-stage venture firm | Seed and initial company building | Technology; company-specific | US venture platform with a national company-building approach |
| Revolution | Multi-strategy investment platform | Seed through growth; fund-specific | Technology and other distinct investment strategies | Investments across US cities, including outside traditional technology hubs |
| Drive Capital | Venture capital platform | Confirm current fund and entry stage | Technology; company-specific | US cities outside coastal hubs, with wider North American connections |
| Chicago Ventures | Early-stage venture firm | Early stage | Enterprise; fintech; healthcare; logistics; other technology | Chicago base and a multi-city portfolio |
| Cultivation Capital | Multi-strategy venture firm | Seed through Series B; strategy-specific | Life sciences; software; agriculture; geospatial technology | Midwest seed strategy and other distinct funds |
| FCA Venture Partners | Healthcare venture firm | Seed and Series A/B; current criteria apply | Healthcare technology and services | Nashville investment team; verify the current company mandate |
| Bread and Butter Ventures | Seed-stage venture firm | Seed | Food technology; enterprise; health and other sectors | Minnesota-based with a published global investment outlook |
| ATX Venture Partners | Early-stage venture firm | Early stage; confirm current round | Applied AI in industrial, healthcare, enterprise and financial systems | Austin roots and a stated North American investment scope |
| LiveOak Ventures | Early-stage venture firm | Seed and Series A; selective other stages | Technology and technology-enabled services | Published founder or CEO connection to Texas |
| Florida Funders | Venture firm and investor network | Pre-seed and seed initial focus; follow-ons through Series B | Early-stage B2B technology | Florida roots and a stated US-wide investment scope |
| Invest Nebraska | Regional company-investment and financing platform | Seed; debt routes differ | Nebraska-linked high-growth businesses | Businesses building in Nebraska |
| New World Angels | Angel network and investment platform | Seed to Series A; member and vehicle-specific | Sector-agnostic; strategy-specific | Strong Florida presence |
| Ann Arbor Angels | Member-led angel organization | Early-stage; member-specific | Innovation-based companies | Primary focus in Southeast Michigan |
| Wisconsin Investment Partners | Angel investment group | Member and application-specific | Company-specific | Wisconsin angel-investment ecosystem |
| Houston Angel Network | Member-led angel network | Member and application-specific | Company-specific | Houston-area angel ecosystem; confirm the active company criteria |
| Gopher Angels | Angel investment organization | Member and application-specific | Company-specific | Minnesota angel ecosystem; verify current geographic requirements |
Regional investors and national strategies serve different jobs
LiveOak states a Texas founder or CEO focus. Invest Nebraska describes businesses building in Nebraska. Florida Funders has Florida roots but says it invests nationally. Bread and Butter has a Minnesota base and a stated global strategy.
Location alone does not settle fund eligibility. Record the firm's actual published criteria and the company's current founder, team and customer connection.
Angel groups are networks, not a count of committed checks
Ann Arbor Angels, Wisconsin Investment Partners, Houston Angel Network and Gopher Angels provide distinct angel routes. New World describes an angel network and related investment vehicles. Screening, individual member decisions and funding are separate events.
A venture manager with several funds is counted once. An accelerator or company-building service should not be mistaken for an available equity allocation.
Match sector and financing stage
FCA publishes a healthcare investment thesis and criteria; ATX describes applied AI; Cultivation separates life sciences, software, agriculture and other strategies. First Round and Primary describe seed company building, while other managers operate across multiple stages.
State which fund fits the next financing milestone. A portfolio's later growth round does not establish a new company's initial entry point.
Turn the national directory into a useful research queue
Start with a small number of relevant regional routes, then add national or sector-specialist managers whose current mandate matches the company's actual facts. Use the linked local guides for more city-level context.
For each candidate, capture an official source and date, the relevant fund or network, supported fit and a specific unanswered question. Do not use a longer directory as a mass-email list.
Investor profiles and official routes
These profiles are a research aid, not a performance ranking. Read the current strategy and portfolio before sharing a deck. A public contact route does not establish that a firm has available allocation for your round.
Sequoia Capital
Venture investment platform. US investment platform with international company-building activity. Sequoia presents company-building and investment resources alongside separate programs. Confirm the current fund, strategy and founder route rather than assuming a universal entry stage.
Sequoia Capital: official investment information
Andreessen Horowitz
Multi-strategy venture platform. US venture platform with several specialized funds. The firm identifies separate sector and growth strategies. Identify the relevant current vehicle and thesis rather than counting each focus area as a separate firm.
Andreessen Horowitz: official investment information
Greylock
Venture investment platform. US venture platform; verify company and team connection. Greylock describes partnering with early teams and runs separate programs. Confirm the current investor route and stage rather than relying on a portfolio company's later financing.
Greylock: official investment information · Contact us
Mucker Capital
Early-stage venture firm and accelerator. Focus on startups outside Silicon Valley; US and other routes vary. Mucker explicitly describes seed and Series A capital for startups outside Silicon Valley and a separate pre-seed accelerator. Check the relevant application and geography.
Mucker Capital: official investment information · Contact Us
Madrona
Venture capital firm. Seattle and Bay Area presence, with wider activity. Madrona describes seed, early and acceleration investment and named technology sectors. Match the actual fund and next milestone; an office alone is not a location requirement.
Madrona: official investment information · Contact
Union Square Ventures
Generalist venture firm. New York-based with investments in multiple markets. USV describes a generalist earliest-stage strategy and New York base. Confirm the current fund and thesis rather than treating a New York office as a universal geographic requirement.
Union Square Ventures: official investment information
Primary Venture Partners
Seed-stage venture firm. New York venture platform; verify the current company-market connection. Primary identifies itself as a seed fund. Explain the company's current stage and specific thesis fit, and confirm the actual geography and route with the team.
Primary Venture Partners: official investment information
First Round
Seed-stage venture firm. US venture platform with a national company-building approach. First Round describes initial company-building investment and publishes founder FAQs. Check the current investment process rather than using its education programs as separate funding routes.
First Round: official investment information
Revolution
Multi-strategy investment platform. Investments across US cities, including outside traditional technology hubs. Revolution distinguishes Rise of the Rest Seed, Ventures, Growth and non-venture activities. A startup should identify the relevant fund instead of counting each as an independent manager.
Revolution: official investment information · Contact
Drive Capital
Venture capital platform. US cities outside coastal hubs, with wider North American connections. Drive presents a multi-city investment footprint. A portfolio location is context; verify the current vehicle and company criteria directly.
Drive Capital: official investment information
Chicago Ventures
Early-stage venture firm. Chicago base and a multi-city portfolio. Chicago Ventures describes early company investment across several industries. Check current fund criteria and the company's market before treating a city office as an eligibility rule.
Chicago Ventures: official investment information
Cultivation Capital
Multi-strategy venture firm. Midwest seed strategy and other distinct funds. Cultivation describes several strategies, including a Midwest seed route. Choose the actual fund and stage rather than assuming one geography or thesis applies across the platform.
Cultivation Capital: official investment information · Contact
FCA Venture Partners
Healthcare venture firm. Nashville investment team; verify the current company mandate. FCA publishes a healthcare-only thesis and current investment criteria. A healthcare label alone does not establish that the company's revenue, growth and round meet those criteria.
FCA Venture Partners: official investment information
Bread and Butter Ventures
Seed-stage venture firm. Minnesota-based with a published global investment outlook. Bread and Butter describes a seed strategy with Minnesota roots and global investing. Distinguish its food technology thesis from consumer packaged goods it says are outside scope.
Bread and Butter Ventures: official investment information
ATX Venture Partners
Early-stage venture firm. Austin roots and a stated North American investment scope. ATX describes applied AI investment across North America. Match the actual product and fund rather than assuming every Texas company or ordinary software application is in scope.
ATX Venture Partners: official investment information · Contact
LiveOak Ventures
Early-stage venture firm. Published founder or CEO connection to Texas. LiveOak explicitly describes Texas-based founders and CEOs. Check the current criteria rather than substituting an Austin office for a nationwide mandate.
LiveOak Ventures: official investment information · Contact Us
Florida Funders
Venture firm and investor network. Florida roots and a stated US-wide investment scope. Florida Funders distinguishes initial pre-seed and seed investment from later follow-ons. Its member network and venture fund are related routes, not two independent managers.
Florida Funders: official investment information
Invest Nebraska
Regional company-investment and financing platform. Businesses building in Nebraska. Invest Nebraska describes seed investment and separate debt products. A company should use the relevant equity route and verify current program requirements.
Invest Nebraska: official investment information · Contact Us
New World Angels
Angel network and investment platform. Strong Florida presence. New World describes an angel network and related innovation fund. Count the platform once and distinguish a member decision or fund application from a committed financing.
New World Angels: official investment information · APPLY FOR FUNDING
Ann Arbor Angels
Member-led angel organization. Primary focus in Southeast Michigan. Ann Arbor Angels describes a regional membership organization. Founder screening and individual investment decisions are distinct; do not count every member as a separate fund.
Ann Arbor Angels: official investment information · Contact Us
Wisconsin Investment Partners
Angel investment group. Wisconsin angel-investment ecosystem. Wisconsin Investment Partners publishes an entrepreneur application route. Confirm the specific group criteria and process; its members are not guaranteed co-investors.
Wisconsin Investment Partners: official investment information
Houston Angel Network
Member-led angel network. Houston-area angel ecosystem; confirm the active company criteria. The entrepreneur route is a starting point for research. Check the current network process and investment criteria; an application does not guarantee member investment.
Houston Angel Network: official investment information · Apply for funding
Gopher Angels
Angel investment organization. Minnesota angel ecosystem; verify current geographic requirements. Gopher Angels offers a network route for founders. Confirm the current process and whether the company's stage and location fit before outreach.
Gopher Angels: official investment information
Worked example: a Texas healthcare software team
Illustrative example, not an investment recommendation. A fictional Texas team has two healthcare pilots and wants to establish repeatable customer adoption. The pilots are not assumed to be recurring contracts.
Questions for a fictional US healthcare startup
| Research route | Possible fit | Question to verify |
|---|---|---|
| LiveOak Ventures | Texas founder and early-stage focus | Does the current team and round fit the published criteria? |
| FCA Venture Partners | Healthcare-specific strategy | Does the company meet the firm's current stage and operating criteria? |
| ATX Venture Partners | Applied AI across healthcare and enterprise | Is the technical application within the present thesis? |
| Houston Angel Network | Regional angel route | Is the company's stage and geography appropriate for the current process? |
No named investor has evaluated the fictional company.
Copy your US investor shortlist worksheet
Use one record for each investor and specific vehicle. Keep the source date beside your fit decision.
US INVESTOR FIT CARD
Company, product and buyer: [shareable facts]
Founder, team and company locations: [actual facts]
Current customers and evidence: [details]
Next financing milestone: [proof to build]
Investor, network and specific vehicle: [names]
Published stage, sector and geography: [official source + date]
Route: [venture fund / angel group / program / debt]
Open question, owner and next research action: [details]Research the shortlist with Aurora, Claude or Codex
Give your AI teammate company facts you are authorized to share. Ask for sourced comparisons and open questions, not automatic introductions or outreach.
Be my US investor-research teammate.
Company, product and buyer: [facts I may share]
Founder, team and company locations: [actual facts]
Current customer and technical proof: [evidence]
Next financing milestone: [proof to build]
Candidate managers, groups and vehicles: [names]
Use current official sources to compare stage, sector and geographic criteria.
Distinguish regional requirements from an investor's office location.
Separate venture funds, angel networks, accelerators and debt.
Deduplicate managers, funds and affiliated networks.
Return source/date, supported fit, missing information and next research action.
Do not invent available funding, eligibility or introductions.
Do not contact investors or give personalized legal, tax or financial advice.Keep the resulting investor records, relationship context and next actions together in Finta. The investor-prospecting workflow covers the next execution step.
Methodology, research date and local guides
Research checked October 29, 2026 by the Finta Editorial Team with AI-assisted source review. We reconciled provider names from our existing city research and reviewed current official strategy, portfolio, location or founder-contact pages. Firms with multiple offices count once; angel networks count as networks, not one committed pooled fund. We distinguish local presence from investment mandate and company eligibility. We do not infer check sizes, investor returns, lead behavior or open allocation from a portfolio logo.
We reused provider-level research from existing US city directories and reviewed current official strategy or founder-route sources. The national guide compares investment stage, regional requirements and route types rather than concatenating city pages. A manager appearing in several cities is counted once; an angel network is not counted as each of its members.
This is a non-exhaustive selection, not a performance ranking. Check the current fund, application process and company requirements directly.
Informational purposes only. Finta is not a law firm or accounting firm. This is general information, not personalized financial, legal or tax advice. Discuss financing structures and tax consequences with your attorney or accountant.
This is a selected research directory, not an exhaustive register or sponsored ranking. Confirm the current vehicle, team and process directly before relying on a fit decision.
- san francisco bay area vc firms angel investors
- seattle vc firms angel investors
- new york city vc firms angel investors
- chicago vc firms angel investors
- nashville venture capital investors
- austin vc firms angel investors
- houston venture capital investors
- omaha venture capital investors
Make the next fundraising step specific
Choose a small set of defensible matches, record the open question, and assign the next action. Use our investor-shortlist guide and warm-introduction guide to prepare the conversation. A longer list should make the research better, not turn into an indiscriminate mailing list.