Research updated September 5, 2026.
Singapore family offices can invest directly in companies, commit to external funds, hold public securities, or combine those activities. A founder seeking startup equity and a GP raising a venture fund should therefore build different shortlists, even when they begin with the same office names.
This list covers ten Singapore-based family offices, private investment offices, and family-backed investment platforms with documented investment activity or mandates. It identifies the capital pathway before the contact pathway. Aurum, for example, combines a family-office investment vehicle with a corporate venture program. OTAMA describes institutional fund access through another firm. TreeHouse explicitly emphasizes introductions.
These are research prospects, not ten open funding applications. Where a relevant public application is not documented, we say so. We do not publish personal contact records, infer family wealth, or assume that a Singapore address means the office invests only in Singapore.
Compare the Singapore investment offices
Alphabetical order is for navigation, not performance or accessibility. “Contact only” means an official business contact, not confirmed acceptance of unsolicited proposals.
| Organization | Classification | Documented investment focus | Approach status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurum Investments | Woh Hup family office and corporate investment vehicle | Companies and fund managers; separate CVC program | Official investment contact/form; no formal application promise |
| Kibo Invest | Private investment office | Climate, impact, and private equity through companies, funds, and co-investments | Public opportunities contact only |
| Octava | Family-office investment holding company | Property, funds, technology companies, and digital assets | General business contact only |
| One Hill Capital | Single-family office | Direct investments, private equity, venture, and liquid securities | General inquiry only |
| OTAMA Capital | Single-family office | Private-capital manager access and separate direct holdings | Institutional access through Hawksburn; office by appointment |
| Rumah Group | Family office with investment and philanthropic activities | Sustainable materials, alternative proteins, circular economy, and nature | No open investment application verified |
| Silverstrand Capital | Single-family office | Biodiversity-positive businesses and nature-finance solutions | No current general investment application verified |
| TreeHouse Capital | Family office | Venture and PE managers, companies, and other assets | Trusted introductions explicitly preferred |
| Tsao Family Office | Family office | Direct and fund investments in venture, growth, and buyouts | General business contact only |
| Will Field Family Office | Single-family office | Japanese equities, VC fund commitments, and direct startups | Investment/business inquiries invited; no formal GP application |
If your priority is an external fund commitment, compare the focused family offices investing in venture capital funds list. Founders should instead start with family offices investing directly in startups.
1. Aurum Investments
Aurum describes itself as the family office and investment vehicle of the Woh Hup Group. It invests across public and private markets and maintains a distinct corporate venture capital program. The official site explicitly mentions both innovative ventures and fund managers.
Its Singapore address and business contact form are public. That establishes an approach channel, not a commitment to review every unsolicited deck. Aurum's investment model and contact
Who should research it: founders whose company fits the relevant investment program, and managers who can identify a matching fund mandate. The first task is to clarify whether the discussion belongs to family capital, CVC, or a particular strategy. Do not assume those decision processes are interchangeable.
2. Kibo Invest
Kibo is a Singapore-based private investment office with climate, impact, and private-equity strategies. It explicitly describes investing through companies, funds, and co-investments. That distinction is useful for both founders and managers.
The firm's news page contains dated 2025 financing and fund announcements. Its opportunities contact is public, but a public address alone does not establish acceptance criteria or an open application process. Kibo's investment strategies, official news
Who should research it: managers or companies with a specific climate, impact, or PE fit. Lead with the relevant mechanism and investment case. The old organization name or website in a database should not substitute for the current Kibo Invest identity.
3. Octava
Octava identifies itself as a Singapore-based investment holding company with family-office activity. Its four stated areas are property, funds, direct technology investments, and digital assets. Fintech and AI are among the named direct-investment themes.
Its philanthropic foundation is separate from the commercial portfolio. A grant request and an equity proposal should not be routed or described as the same opportunity. Octava investment scope
Who should research it: companies or managers able to identify a specific portfolio fit. The public information does not establish a universal stage, check size, or fund-manager intake policy. Ask about the relevant strategy before interpreting a general contact as an invitation to distribute materials.
4. One Hill Capital
One Hill Capital is a single-family office headquartered in Singapore. Its published asset mix includes direct investments, private equity, venture capital, and liquid securities.
The website provides a general inquiry route. It also has a separate careers section; an employment application is not a route for investment proposals. The broad mandate does not specify which current private-fund strategies are open to new relationships. One Hill's mandate and contact
Who should research it: a founder or manager with a sufficiently specific fit hypothesis to ask a targeted initial question. Keep undisclosed stage, fund sequence, sector preferences, and check size marked unknown rather than converting the broad asset mix into invented criteria.
5. OTAMA Capital
OTAMA's official portfolio separates direct holdings from its institutional book. It describes accessing private-capital managers through Hawksburn, including venture and private-equity exposure.
This is an important routing distinction. The existence of a fund relationship does not mean the family office independently accepts fund pitches. Its office correspondence is by appointment, and its disclosure says the holdings are presented to explain its philosophy rather than solicit investment. OTAMA portfolio and access model
Who should research it: managers examining delegated institutional access, or companies whose direct opportunity matches the office's stated approach. Do not imply that an introduction to OTAMA automatically provides access to the named underlying managers.
6. Rumah Group
Rumah Group is a Singapore family office combining impact investing and philanthropy. The commercial investment themes include sustainable materials, alternative proteins, circular-economy models, and nature-based solutions. The foundation's humanitarian and ocean activities are a distinct channel.
Its investment-values statement also sets out exclusions and addresses indirect fund exposure. That makes mandate alignment more specific than simply calling an opportunity “sustainable.” Investment scope, investment values
Who should research it: teams that can substantiate both the commercial opportunity and the relevant environmental or social contribution. We did not verify an open investment application. A privacy contact or a grant-related pathway should not be repurposed as a startup or fund submission route.
7. Silverstrand Capital
Silverstrand's published strategy centers on biodiversity-positive investment. It identifies areas including natural-capital measurement, habitat protection, pollution solutions, regenerative agriculture, and ecosystem restoration.
The official site links investment examples and describes its Singapore family-office context. Its accelerator history can help explain the thesis, but a prior accelerator cohort is not evidence of a currently open general application. Silverstrand strategy, investment philosophy
Who should research it: businesses whose model has a credible relationship to biodiversity or nature outcomes. A generic carbon claim is not enough to establish that fit. No current general proposal intake was verified, and the article does not infer an available allocation or a recent investment date from a website update.
8. TreeHouse Capital
TreeHouse describes a Singapore family office investing across managers, companies, and public and private markets. Its site identifies venture-fund and private-equity relationships separately from direct company exposure.
The approach is explicitly relationship-led. The website welcomes selected conversations through trusted introductions, rather than presenting an unrestricted application portal. TreeHouse investment activities and introduction policy
Who should research it: managers or founders with a genuine, permission-based connection and a relevant investment proposition. The named portfolio relationships are context, not an endorsement of another investor or a promise that the same strategy is available to new managers.
9. Tsao Family Office
Tsao Family Office publishes a multi-asset mandate that includes both direct investments and external funds in venture capital, growth equity, and buyouts. It also distinguishes investments with an explicit impact objective from investments evaluated primarily for financial objectives with ESG considerations.
The office's Singapore location and general business contact are public. Its philanthropic objectives do not make its investment book an unrestricted grant program. Tsao's investment approach
Who should research it: GPs and company teams who can specify which investment pathway they are proposing. For impact strategies, describe the intended outcomes and risks without assuming that every allocation has the same impact mandate.
10. Will Field Family Office
Will Field describes itself as a Singapore single-family office with Japanese listed equities at the core of its portfolio, alongside VC fund commitments and direct startup investments. Its named themes include food systems, circular economy, education, clean energy, and DeepTech.
The official site separates VC fund exposure from direct companies and secondary-fund exposure. It invites investment and business inquiries, but that is not a published GP application with universal eligibility rules. Will Field portfolio and approach
Who should research it: teams whose fund or company fits the relevant thematic and geographic experience. Distinguish a primary VC commitment from a secondary strategy, and avoid assuming that every named portfolio company's stage defines the office's current stage mandate.
How to use a Singapore family-office list
Make two pipelines if you are researching both a company round and a fundraise. The first asks, “Can this office buy equity in this business?” The second asks, “Does it commit capital to external managers with this strategy?” Evidence for one does not prove the other.
For each entry, record the official entity, investment mode, thesis, region, evidence date, approach policy, and next step. Add a confidence field. “Private equity exposure, structure undisclosed” is more useful than an invented “LP taking Fund I applications” label.
A Singapore office may have global investments. Conversely, a globally known family may use different teams or vehicles in different places. Match the actual investment office and mandate, not a personal residence, conference attendance, or a family surname.
Approach restrictions matter. If a firm prefers introductions, obtain permission from the connector. If no relevant public intake is verified, do not treat a foundation, careers page, or privacy-policy address as a funding portal.
Methodology and limits
This article uses current official descriptions, portfolio information, and organization-level research leads. We distinguish self-described family offices from investment holding companies and CVC vehicles. We do not infer ownership subtype where the public source only says “family office.”
Some offices publish detailed portfolios; others publish a broad mandate without transaction dates. We disclose those limits rather than inventing recent activity. Published information does not establish available capital, likely acceptance, a particular check size, or a response time.
The list is alphabetical, not ranked by wealth or investment performance. This is investor-discovery research, not individualized investment, legal, tax, or placement advice. It is not a directory of private individuals or a claim that Finta can obtain access to them.
Move from names to relevant conversations
For a GP, use Finta's guide to prioritizing prospective LPs, then connect the evidence to the LP fundraising follow-up workflow. For a founder, Finta's fundraising workspace provides the next step for organizing a company fundraising process.